<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Professional Podcasting #1: The Mic Matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/28/professional-podcasting-1-the-mic-matters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/28/professional-podcasting-1-the-mic-matters/</link>
	<description>Michael W. Geoghegan's Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 04:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Beginner&#8217;s Podcasting Guide: Almost Everything You Need to Know to Start &#171; The Beaver Pond</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/28/professional-podcasting-1-the-mic-matters/#comment-147910</link>
		<dc:creator>A Beginner&#8217;s Podcasting Guide: Almost Everything You Need to Know to Start &#171; The Beaver Pond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 03:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/28/professional-podcasting-1-the-mic-matters/#comment-147910</guid>
		<description>[...] Microphones. If you&#8217;re just starting out and not yet monetizing, you don&#8217;t have to get $400 microphones. But if you want a professional podcast that you will later monetize, the microphone matters. My mics range from $1 to $150, not including the mic that&#8217;s native to my Zoom H4. I use the dollar-store mic on an older computer, for tests now, though I did use it for many of my early podcasts. It produces a clear but very thin sound, so if you&#8217;re not up to adding effects to improve the result, start with something in the $50-100 range. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microphones. If you&#8217;re just starting out and not yet monetizing, you don&#8217;t have to get $400 microphones. But if you want a professional podcast that you will later monetize, the microphone matters. My mics range from $1 to $150, not including the mic that&#8217;s native to my Zoom H4. I use the dollar-store mic on an older computer, for tests now, though I did use it for many of my early podcasts. It produces a clear but very thin sound, so if you&#8217;re not up to adding effects to improve the result, start with something in the $50-100 range. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/28/professional-podcasting-1-the-mic-matters/#comment-127343</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 06:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/28/professional-podcasting-1-the-mic-matters/#comment-127343</guid>
		<description>Dave,

I've used one while doing an episode of TWIT at Leo's.  At least I remember it being the PR-40. It was definitely Heil. Sounded good. I know that Heil has "seeded" and or loaned mics to some podcasters and deservedly gained praise. They are great mics. That said, I've always been happy with my RE-20 and have yet to use a mic that has moved me to change. Of course, different types of voices will also have an effect on how well the matches the user's voice and speech characteristics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used one while doing an episode of TWIT at Leo&#8217;s.  At least I remember it being the PR-40. It was definitely Heil. Sounded good. I know that Heil has &#8220;seeded&#8221; and or loaned mics to some podcasters and deservedly gained praise. They are great mics. That said, I&#8217;ve always been happy with my RE-20 and have yet to use a mic that has moved me to change. Of course, different types of voices will also have an effect on how well the matches the user&#8217;s voice and speech characteristics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Jackson</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/28/professional-podcasting-1-the-mic-matters/#comment-127333</link>
		<dc:creator>David Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 04:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/28/professional-podcasting-1-the-mic-matters/#comment-127333</guid>
		<description>Michael,
Do you have any feedback of the RE-20 vs the Heil PR-40?

Dave Jackson
www.schoolofpodcasting.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,<br />
Do you have any feedback of the RE-20 vs the Heil PR-40?</p>
<p>Dave Jackson<br />
<a href="http://www.schoolofpodcasting.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.schoolofpodcasting.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/28/professional-podcasting-1-the-mic-matters/#comment-126547</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/28/professional-podcasting-1-the-mic-matters/#comment-126547</guid>
		<description>Scott,

Nice remote recording setup.  The Marantz PMD670 is a solid performer. I've had  a chance to use all of the &lt;a href="http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/01/17/the-marantz-pmd-family/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Marantz digital recorders&lt;/a&gt;, including the new PMD620. The PMD670 has always been one &lt;a href="http://mwgblog.com/archives/2005/08/31/marantz-pmd670-case-study/" rel="nofollow"&gt;I've recommended&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>Nice remote recording setup.  The Marantz PMD670 is a solid performer. I&#8217;ve had  a chance to use all of the <a href="http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/01/17/the-marantz-pmd-family/" rel="nofollow">Marantz digital recorders</a>, including the new PMD620. The PMD670 has always been one <a href="http://mwgblog.com/archives/2005/08/31/marantz-pmd670-case-study/" rel="nofollow">I&#8217;ve recommended</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Whitney</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/28/professional-podcasting-1-the-mic-matters/#comment-126538</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Whitney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/28/professional-podcasting-1-the-mic-matters/#comment-126538</guid>
		<description>Couldn't agree more with the E-Voice RE20   dual windscreen rig for in-studio work.  That's what we use at PodWorx.

For our remote recording, we use the E-Voice RE50B which, when combined with the Marantz PMD670 makes for an outstanding "portable studio".  (The RE50B looks good with the mic flag as well.)

And though this is a bit off-topic, I was pleasantly surprised by the quality of the Edirol R-09 as a all-in-one mic recorder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more with the E-Voice RE20   dual windscreen rig for in-studio work.  That&#8217;s what we use at PodWorx.</p>
<p>For our remote recording, we use the E-Voice RE50B which, when combined with the Marantz PMD670 makes for an outstanding &#8220;portable studio&#8221;.  (The RE50B looks good with the mic flag as well.)</p>
<p>And though this is a bit off-topic, I was pleasantly surprised by the quality of the Edirol R-09 as a all-in-one mic recorder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/28/professional-podcasting-1-the-mic-matters/#comment-126511</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/28/professional-podcasting-1-the-mic-matters/#comment-126511</guid>
		<description>Good point Keirsun. I actually took off the big foam windscreen for the picture. In the past I've also used the &lt;a href="http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/09/21/mic-flags/" rel="nofollow"&gt;dual windscreens&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Keirsun. I actually took off the big foam windscreen for the picture. In the past I&#8217;ve also used the <a href="http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/09/21/mic-flags/" rel="nofollow">dual windscreens</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keirsun Scott</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/28/professional-podcasting-1-the-mic-matters/#comment-126499</link>
		<dc:creator>Keirsun Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/28/professional-podcasting-1-the-mic-matters/#comment-126499</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the roundup of great microphones and their specific applications.  The Electro-Voice RE20 is indeed the best studio mic I have ever worked with and is well-worth the price. Just don't forget a screen of some sort because the RE20 picks up everything. I look forward to your post on digital recorders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the roundup of great microphones and their specific applications.  The Electro-Voice RE20 is indeed the best studio mic I have ever worked with and is well-worth the price. Just don&#8217;t forget a screen of some sort because the RE20 picks up everything. I look forward to your post on digital recorders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
