<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RawVoice Takes 6 Months to Pay Podcasters?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/12/rawvoice-takes-6-months-to-pay-podcasters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/12/rawvoice-takes-6-months-to-pay-podcasters/</link>
	<description>Michael W. Geoghegan&#039;s Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:25:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MWGblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New Media Expo: Top Ten Take Aways</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/12/rawvoice-takes-6-months-to-pay-podcasters/comment-page-1/#comment-149695</link>
		<dc:creator>MWGblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New Media Expo: Top Ten Take Aways</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 05:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/12/rawvoice-takes-6-months-to-pay-podcasters/#comment-149695</guid>
		<description>[...] advice is to contact Todd Cochrane. Wow! Big surprise there. Many know that I have, at times, been critical of Todd’s collection of companies. But I also give credit where credit is due. With the shift of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] advice is to contact Todd Cochrane. Wow! Big surprise there. Many know that I have, at times, been critical of Todd’s collection of companies. But I also give credit where credit is due. With the shift of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Cochrane</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/12/rawvoice-takes-6-months-to-pay-podcasters/comment-page-1/#comment-122934</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Cochrane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/12/rawvoice-takes-6-months-to-pay-podcasters/#comment-122934</guid>
		<description>Possibly taking up to six months to pay on a once year event is much different than implying we took six months to pay! Which we havent. We shared a unusual experience we had last year and wanted everyone forwarned in case the payments took six months. 

To date though I will repeat all of our campaigns have paid 60-90 days with one or two exceptions where payments went to about 100 days.

Forwarning someone of a possibility is much different than someone waiting for a payment that could be delayed.

The question some will ask is why would the CES sponsorships be different. Last year we got paid on nearly six months worth of long tail downloads, closing the ad deal to early would have caused the sacrifice of multiple thousands of dollars in revenue. Andy and I where willing to wait longer than 90 days for significantly larger paychecks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibly taking up to six months to pay on a once year event is much different than implying we took six months to pay! Which we havent. We shared a unusual experience we had last year and wanted everyone forwarned in case the payments took six months. </p>
<p>To date though I will repeat all of our campaigns have paid 60-90 days with one or two exceptions where payments went to about 100 days.</p>
<p>Forwarning someone of a possibility is much different than someone waiting for a payment that could be delayed.</p>
<p>The question some will ask is why would the CES sponsorships be different. Last year we got paid on nearly six months worth of long tail downloads, closing the ad deal to early would have caused the sacrifice of multiple thousands of dollars in revenue. Andy and I where willing to wait longer than 90 days for significantly larger paychecks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/12/rawvoice-takes-6-months-to-pay-podcasters/comment-page-1/#comment-122932</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/12/rawvoice-takes-6-months-to-pay-podcasters/#comment-122932</guid>
		<description>Todd:

I&#039;ve clarified many times.  There&#039;s no need to astroturf the web defiling my name.  Check your email records, or the history of the techpodcast mailing list.  This discussion that occurred months ago was public, unless you&#039;ve removed it.

Let alone that if I were to have taken you up on the CES sponsorship, you openly admitted that it could take up to six months to pay.

I don&#039;t have an axe to grind with you, Todd.  You&#039;re just the only one who I named by name that denies what I said in the article posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd:</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve clarified many times.  There&#8217;s no need to astroturf the web defiling my name.  Check your email records, or the history of the techpodcast mailing list.  This discussion that occurred months ago was public, unless you&#8217;ve removed it.</p>
<p>Let alone that if I were to have taken you up on the CES sponsorship, you openly admitted that it could take up to six months to pay.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have an axe to grind with you, Todd.  You&#8217;re just the only one who I named by name that denies what I said in the article posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Cochrane</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/12/rawvoice-takes-6-months-to-pay-podcasters/comment-page-1/#comment-122713</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Cochrane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 03:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/12/rawvoice-takes-6-months-to-pay-podcasters/#comment-122713</guid>
		<description>The author of the article had a axe to grind. He was paid for a campaign that ended on Sept 30th on Dec 12th hardly six months. Most of our payments take 60-90 days. Very rarely have we ever went over 90 days.

The same person that is in a different ad buy his October deliveries which was invoiced on Nov 5th will be paid next week. Very unfair coverage by this person.

This is the same show that has their podcast set to Autoplay anytime anyone visits their website and they have huge numbers of downloads from a single IP.  

I can go on but will not. I have asked that person to clarify how they count six months but their is no math known to man that causes it to add up the way they have it figured.

Todd
808-741-4923</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The author of the article had a axe to grind. He was paid for a campaign that ended on Sept 30th on Dec 12th hardly six months. Most of our payments take 60-90 days. Very rarely have we ever went over 90 days.</p>
<p>The same person that is in a different ad buy his October deliveries which was invoiced on Nov 5th will be paid next week. Very unfair coverage by this person.</p>
<p>This is the same show that has their podcast set to Autoplay anytime anyone visits their website and they have huge numbers of downloads from a single IP.  </p>
<p>I can go on but will not. I have asked that person to clarify how they count six months but their is no math known to man that causes it to add up the way they have it figured.</p>
<p>Todd<br />
808-741-4923</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On Podcast Advertising And Statistics : Awakened Voice</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/12/rawvoice-takes-6-months-to-pay-podcasters/comment-page-1/#comment-122686</link>
		<dc:creator>On Podcast Advertising And Statistics : Awakened Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2008/01/12/rawvoice-takes-6-months-to-pay-podcasters/#comment-122686</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Geoghegan saw fit to take a swipe at RawVoice in a recent post because Mark Hopkins alleged that it took six months to get him paid for an ad deal. Mike is off base because he&#8217;s comparing apples to oranges and also doesn&#8217;t know the whole story. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Geoghegan saw fit to take a swipe at RawVoice in a recent post because Mark Hopkins alleged that it took six months to get him paid for an ad deal. Mike is off base because he&#8217;s comparing apples to oranges and also doesn&#8217;t know the whole story. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

