<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marantz PMD 620</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mwgblog.com/archives/2007/11/29/marantz-pmd-620/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2007/11/29/marantz-pmd-620/</link>
	<description>Michael W. Geoghegan&#039;s Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:15:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Indrek</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2007/11/29/marantz-pmd-620/comment-page-1/#comment-118570</link>
		<dc:creator>Indrek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2007/11/29/marantz-pmd-620/#comment-118570</guid>
		<description>A Review on Transcom Tools speaks about a delay in signal getting to headphones: 
&quot;Much more troubling is the short delay in the sound reaching the headphones, presumably a latency caused by monitoring the sound after it has been through the electronic processing of the record circuit. It&#039;s a very short delay, but just enough to make it difficult to speak while monitoring on headphones. There&#039;s something very unnerving about hearing one&#039;s voice on a short delay, making it difficult to speak naturally, something to keep in mind if one is planning on using one&#039;s questions in the final production.&quot;
http://www.transom.org/tools/recording_interviewing/200712_marantz_620/

Do you tests confirm this delay? When so, this is really a sad thing, and a reason to give up on this one too. So Sony PCM-D50 is the last change. even though its over my bugget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Review on Transcom Tools speaks about a delay in signal getting to headphones:<br />
&#8220;Much more troubling is the short delay in the sound reaching the headphones, presumably a latency caused by monitoring the sound after it has been through the electronic processing of the record circuit. It&#8217;s a very short delay, but just enough to make it difficult to speak while monitoring on headphones. There&#8217;s something very unnerving about hearing one&#8217;s voice on a short delay, making it difficult to speak naturally, something to keep in mind if one is planning on using one&#8217;s questions in the final production.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.transom.org/tools/recording_interviewing/200712_marantz_620/" rel="nofollow">http://www.transom.org/tools/recording_interviewing/200712_marantz_620/</a></p>
<p>Do you tests confirm this delay? When so, this is really a sad thing, and a reason to give up on this one too. So Sony PCM-D50 is the last change. even though its over my bugget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LUSTORAMA</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2007/11/29/marantz-pmd-620/comment-page-1/#comment-117132</link>
		<dc:creator>LUSTORAMA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 10:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2007/11/29/marantz-pmd-620/#comment-117132</guid>
		<description>The speaker is really , really cheap, I&#039;d say, anemic!
If you don&#039;t stick your ear against the unit, you won&#039;t get anything!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The speaker is really , really cheap, I&#8217;d say, anemic!<br />
If you don&#8217;t stick your ear against the unit, you won&#8217;t get anything!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Sands</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2007/11/29/marantz-pmd-620/comment-page-1/#comment-112161</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Sands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2007/11/29/marantz-pmd-620/#comment-112161</guid>
		<description>I would love to hear what you think about the Marantz PMD 620. I&#039;m a composer and I&#039;m thinking of getting it and retiring my hand held sony cassette recorder (yuk!). I&#039;m wondering what the speaker in the 620 sounds like. I&#039;m not expecting much but is it say as good as the speaker on my Mac 14&quot; iBook? It&#039;s a stereo recorder so is there 2 speakers or only one? I want to use it as something I would have near me when I&#039;m away from my studio and pick up a guitar and sing into it to capture songwriting ideas. If the speaker is decent then it would eliminate having to have headphones all the time to hear what I had recorded into it. That&#039;s the problem with so many of these small digital recorders - they never have a speaker in them.
Thanks for your time,
Robert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to hear what you think about the Marantz PMD 620. I&#8217;m a composer and I&#8217;m thinking of getting it and retiring my hand held sony cassette recorder (yuk!). I&#8217;m wondering what the speaker in the 620 sounds like. I&#8217;m not expecting much but is it say as good as the speaker on my Mac 14&#8243; iBook? It&#8217;s a stereo recorder so is there 2 speakers or only one? I want to use it as something I would have near me when I&#8217;m away from my studio and pick up a guitar and sing into it to capture songwriting ideas. If the speaker is decent then it would eliminate having to have headphones all the time to hear what I had recorded into it. That&#8217;s the problem with so many of these small digital recorders &#8211; they never have a speaker in them.<br />
Thanks for your time,<br />
Robert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
