<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcast Professional - A Definition?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/04/10/podcast-professional-a-definition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/04/10/podcast-professional-a-definition/</link>
	<description>Michael W. Geoghegan's Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Lassoff</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/04/10/podcast-professional-a-definition/#comment-67756</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Lassoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 03:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/04/10/podcast-professional-a-definition/#comment-67756</guid>
		<description>Maybe its a little late in the game to be commenting on this, however, the ideal of being a professional versus professionalism is fascinating to me.

I think there is plenty of unmitigated crap out there in the Podcast world-- embarrassing audio assemblages of poorly written drivel and unlimitedly bad production values.  I strive in my podcasts, to sound professional.  That doesn't mean that I try to sound like the z-morning zoo guy or like a CBS news anchor-- I do try for clear diction, good production, modulation, and consistent levels.  

I am self trained (with the exception of Michael's book) and am always trying to do better... This is professionalism.  I'll be a professional when I find a way to get paid for what I am doing.

I'm not sure (by my definition) being a professional means that you are espousing professionalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe its a little late in the game to be commenting on this, however, the ideal of being a professional versus professionalism is fascinating to me.</p>
<p>I think there is plenty of unmitigated crap out there in the Podcast world&#8211; embarrassing audio assemblages of poorly written drivel and unlimitedly bad production values.  I strive in my podcasts, to sound professional.  That doesn&#8217;t mean that I try to sound like the z-morning zoo guy or like a CBS news anchor&#8211; I do try for clear diction, good production, modulation, and consistent levels.  </p>
<p>I am self trained (with the exception of Michael&#8217;s book) and am always trying to do better&#8230; This is professionalism.  I&#8217;ll be a professional when I find a way to get paid for what I am doing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure (by my definition) being a professional means that you are espousing professionalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Crossman</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/04/10/podcast-professional-a-definition/#comment-871</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Crossman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 14:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/04/10/podcast-professional-a-definition/#comment-871</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the story, Michael. I think there's a fine line on this issue. On one hand, I agree that "repurposed" podcasts aren't exactly the same as "native" podcasts. Still, I think there's a lot of content out there from the media companies that is now available for free that wasn't before -- esp. video podcasts. I do not wish for that trend to abate because I like being to timeshift or have access to that content (examples: VH1's Best Day Ever podcast, Jack Black's Nacho Libre Confessionals). 

At the same time, us "from the ground up as a podcast" podcasters do need to evangelize what we're doing. And, as you've noted at various conferences, this does afford us opportunities to make a profession of it (either by ad revenue or more likely by consulting opportunities).

I'd say there'd have to be a certain degree of income before someone could be called a "professional" podcaster. That's not the same thing as "acting professional" while generating no income. I think I'm professional in approach but I'd hardly call myself a professional podcaster. 

More importantly, I think there's a lot of people starting to generate income. That's the success story that need to be continued to be told.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the story, Michael. I think there&#8217;s a fine line on this issue. On one hand, I agree that &#8220;repurposed&#8221; podcasts aren&#8217;t exactly the same as &#8220;native&#8221; podcasts. Still, I think there&#8217;s a lot of content out there from the media companies that is now available for free that wasn&#8217;t before &#8212; esp. video podcasts. I do not wish for that trend to abate because I like being to timeshift or have access to that content (examples: VH1&#8217;s Best Day Ever podcast, Jack Black&#8217;s Nacho Libre Confessionals). </p>
<p>At the same time, us &#8220;from the ground up as a podcast&#8221; podcasters do need to evangelize what we&#8217;re doing. And, as you&#8217;ve noted at various conferences, this does afford us opportunities to make a profession of it (either by ad revenue or more likely by consulting opportunities).</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say there&#8217;d have to be a certain degree of income before someone could be called a &#8220;professional&#8221; podcaster. That&#8217;s not the same thing as &#8220;acting professional&#8221; while generating no income. I think I&#8217;m professional in approach but I&#8217;d hardly call myself a professional podcaster. </p>
<p>More importantly, I think there&#8217;s a lot of people starting to generate income. That&#8217;s the success story that need to be continued to be told.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Podcast Free America &#187; Who&#8217;s a Podcast Professional?</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/04/10/podcast-professional-a-definition/#comment-869</link>
		<dc:creator>Podcast Free America &#187; Who&#8217;s a Podcast Professional?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 11:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/04/10/podcast-professional-a-definition/#comment-869</guid>
		<description>[...] Podcast Professional - A Definition? Are you a professional if you earn your living podcasting? A few of us can answer yes to this question. Are you a professional if you create and deliver quality content that you give away with no financial incentive? I know countless people who can say yes to this. Are you a professional if others turn to you for guidance, advice and consulting – often paying for the privilege? Again, some of us can say yes to this. The person interviewing me, I found out, meant people skilled in interviewing and the production of audio shows. Fair enough. I know many people who work very hard on their interview and audio production skills. Are they professional podcasters or professional interviewers? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Podcast Professional - A Definition? Are you a professional if you earn your living podcasting? A few of us can answer yes to this question. Are you a professional if you create and deliver quality content that you give away with no financial incentive? I know countless people who can say yes to this. Are you a professional if others turn to you for guidance, advice and consulting – often paying for the privilege? Again, some of us can say yes to this. The person interviewing me, I found out, meant people skilled in interviewing and the production of audio shows. Fair enough. I know many people who work very hard on their interview and audio production skills. Are they professional podcasters or professional interviewers? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
