<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The PodShow Contract</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/</link>
	<description>Michael W. Geoghegan's Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 06:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Noinepype</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-117833</link>
		<dc:creator>Noinepype</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 02:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-117833</guid>
		<description>Hello: 
 
Check out what the federal government is doing to [url=http://forums.spry.com/member.php?u=9644 ] Verizon Ringtones[/url]. 
 
Thanks,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello: </p>
<p>Check out what the federal government is doing to [url=http://forums.spry.com/member.php?u=9644 ] Verizon Ringtones[/url]. </p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Gun</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-95512</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Gun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-95512</guid>
		<description>Good news guys 
I here I with you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news guys<br />
I here I with you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brestytremoky</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-50607</link>
		<dc:creator>Brestytremoky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 21:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-50607</guid>
		<description>Appallmuh 
american idol result today 
american early idol result 
2007 8 american idol loser march 
Coottamvaldob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appallmuh<br />
american idol result today<br />
american early idol result<br />
2007 8 american idol loser march<br />
Coottamvaldob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mermu</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-4693</link>
		<dc:creator>Mermu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 16:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-4693</guid>
		<description>You guys do a great job of looking at this objectively. I agree on one stance...this is business and if Adam and Podshow can get this business than so be it. Isn't it PT Barnum that said "There's a sucker born every minute." ? 

But we podcasters are a community, and I think there are good reasons so many people are up in arms. 

They feel misled and lied to. I've been listening to the DSC for almost a year and the impression Adam gives about Podshow is an anathema to what it actually is. If that contract is a true representation about what Podshow offers, than I am not only NOT ever going to sign that contract, I think less of Podshow as a potential audience member/consumer and I certainly think less of Adam Curry as a "podcast emissary." 

Another reason people are so rankled and vocal about this is that we are a community. Adam Curry's right. Podcasting sprang up and will be successful because it gives producers of content and musicians and everyone in the process more freedom to create unique content and more rights. If that contract is accurate, Podshow is part of the problem that podcasting hopes to solve. As part of the community I want to make people aware of that. I'm not going to hate you for signing it (although I might think you are a bit of idiot.)

Some people express themselves more vitriolically I suppose. There's really no need to denigrate ANYBODY who is talking about this contract no matter what point they take. It's important that it's being talked about though. And it is a big deal...no matter how you feel about Podshow, Adam Curry, Keith, His girlfriend, me or any other commenter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys do a great job of looking at this objectively. I agree on one stance&#8230;this is business and if Adam and Podshow can get this business than so be it. Isn&#8217;t it PT Barnum that said &#8220;There&#8217;s a sucker born every minute.&#8221; ? </p>
<p>But we podcasters are a community, and I think there are good reasons so many people are up in arms. </p>
<p>They feel misled and lied to. I&#8217;ve been listening to the DSC for almost a year and the impression Adam gives about Podshow is an anathema to what it actually is. If that contract is a true representation about what Podshow offers, than I am not only NOT ever going to sign that contract, I think less of Podshow as a potential audience member/consumer and I certainly think less of Adam Curry as a &#8220;podcast emissary.&#8221; </p>
<p>Another reason people are so rankled and vocal about this is that we are a community. Adam Curry&#8217;s right. Podcasting sprang up and will be successful because it gives producers of content and musicians and everyone in the process more freedom to create unique content and more rights. If that contract is accurate, Podshow is part of the problem that podcasting hopes to solve. As part of the community I want to make people aware of that. I&#8217;m not going to hate you for signing it (although I might think you are a bit of idiot.)</p>
<p>Some people express themselves more vitriolically I suppose. There&#8217;s really no need to denigrate ANYBODY who is talking about this contract no matter what point they take. It&#8217;s important that it&#8217;s being talked about though. And it is a big deal&#8230;no matter how you feel about Podshow, Adam Curry, Keith, His girlfriend, me or any other commenter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Multi-Media Me &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Podshow Commentary from Blosphere - Curry Needs a Name Change</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Multi-Media Me &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Podshow Commentary from Blosphere - Curry Needs a Name Change</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 00:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-810</guid>
		<description>[...] Now from a comment on MWG blog he says “In the vain of full disclosure, I was offered a “Founding Member” contract with BoKu Communications/PodShow in March of last year. This was the offer that was made to the original podcasters in the network, Dawn and Drew, Michael Butler etc. I have always respected the wish for confidentiality regarding this agreement, but I will note, as might be expected, it was considerably different than the current contract.” So I am hoping that the contract that was placed in front of them was much more aligned with the philosophical nature of maintaining IP and one can wish that it also has some sort of creative commons mash-upness to it. Note: I do not see any Creative Commons references on the Podshow web site so I am guessing that is a pipe dream. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now from a comment on MWG blog he says “In the vain of full disclosure, I was offered a “Founding Member” contract with BoKu Communications/PodShow in March of last year. This was the offer that was made to the original podcasters in the network, Dawn and Drew, Michael Butler etc. I have always respected the wish for confidentiality regarding this agreement, but I will note, as might be expected, it was considerably different than the current contract.” So I am hoping that the contract that was placed in front of them was much more aligned with the philosophical nature of maintaining IP and one can wish that it also has some sort of creative commons mash-upness to it. Note: I do not see any Creative Commons references on the Podshow web site so I am guessing that is a pipe dream. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The All New Ewan&#8217;s Musings &#187; Debunking The PodShow Contract</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>The All New Ewan&#8217;s Musings &#187; Debunking The PodShow Contract</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 08:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-800</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: Some links: Michael Geoghegan, Paul Colligan.    . [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: Some links: Michael Geoghegan, Paul Colligan.    . [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Colligan&#8217;s Profitable Podcasting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; On Podcasting Contracts, Exclusivity, and the Rest of the &#8220;Conversation&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Colligan&#8217;s Profitable Podcasting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; On Podcasting Contracts, Exclusivity, and the Rest of the &#8220;Conversation&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 23:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-797</guid>
		<description>[...] The Mighty Mike Goeghagen chimed in with his thoughts:  In the vain of full disclosure, I was offered a “Founding Member” contract with BoKu Communications/PodShow in March of last year. This was the offer that was made to the original podcasters in the network, Dawn and Drew, Michael Butler etc. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Mighty Mike Goeghagen chimed in with his thoughts:  In the vain of full disclosure, I was offered a “Founding Member” contract with BoKu Communications/PodShow in March of last year. This was the offer that was made to the original podcasters in the network, Dawn and Drew, Michael Butler etc. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Crossman</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Crossman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 21:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-796</guid>
		<description>Michael,
Your take on this is very helpful and appreciated. You have the background to have an opinion about these things but do so with an objective viewpoint.  I appreciate that you didn't freak out about this course of events, like others have.

It's great to see folks like you taking a leadership position within the industry, fighting for interests of all kinds of podcasters, and moving the industry forward in a positive direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,<br />
Your take on this is very helpful and appreciated. You have the background to have an opinion about these things but do so with an objective viewpoint.  I appreciate that you didn&#8217;t freak out about this course of events, like others have.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s great to see folks like you taking a leadership position within the industry, fighting for interests of all kinds of podcasters, and moving the industry forward in a positive direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Starr</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Starr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 12:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-795</guid>
		<description>The Mary and Karla show podfaded (http://fmstudio.com/mkforum/viewtopic.php?t=316).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mary and Karla show podfaded (http://fmstudio.com/mkforum/viewtopic.php?t=316).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy jchtv.com</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy jchtv.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-794</guid>
		<description>Has anyone else noticed that The Mary and Karla Show has been idle since Feb 3rd. I think that is quietly saying something about their excitement on joining Podshow...like the Blue Flu?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone else noticed that The Mary and Karla Show has been idle since Feb 3rd. I think that is quietly saying something about their excitement on joining Podshow&#8230;like the Blue Flu?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob S</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 02:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-786</guid>
		<description>I have seen the contract as a result of being associated with another (much more famous and talented) person in the world of podcasting. You are right on in calling the terms of the contract vague. By signing the deal you give up a whole lot without a guarantee of anything in return. Anyone who thinks they have talent should run from such deals.

My advice to podcasters is this. Don't sell yourself short. Hosting is cheap and the last time I checked a Wordpress blog is free. If you seriously want to build a show then build it yourself while retaining all the rights to your name, likeness and the content of the show. If what you do turns out to be that good then you will get better opportunities down the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen the contract as a result of being associated with another (much more famous and talented) person in the world of podcasting. You are right on in calling the terms of the contract vague. By signing the deal you give up a whole lot without a guarantee of anything in return. Anyone who thinks they have talent should run from such deals.</p>
<p>My advice to podcasters is this. Don&#8217;t sell yourself short. Hosting is cheap and the last time I checked a Wordpress blog is free. If you seriously want to build a show then build it yourself while retaining all the rights to your name, likeness and the content of the show. If what you do turns out to be that good then you will get better opportunities down the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy jchtv.com</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-780</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy jchtv.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/29/the-podshow-contract/#comment-780</guid>
		<description>Michael, enjoyed your commet on DSC. As a new vlogger and longtime listener of podcasts in general, I'm sitting on the sidelines enjoying all this. I agree with you on the IBM dry cleaner thing. This bitching reminds me of the early 80's when I saw bands like U2, Police and Talking Heads before they got big airplay. As soon as they did, it was time to like another band, or at least the college radio DJ's thought so. I enjoyed our quick meet at PME last November and I've resubscribed to RRR. I love your choice in movies, but get a little edgy and trash something that is sacred once in a while. Thanks for writing Podcast Solutions, now can ya help a vlogger with that darn Wordpress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, enjoyed your commet on DSC. As a new vlogger and longtime listener of podcasts in general, I&#8217;m sitting on the sidelines enjoying all this. I agree with you on the IBM dry cleaner thing. This bitching reminds me of the early 80&#8217;s when I saw bands like U2, Police and Talking Heads before they got big airplay. As soon as they did, it was time to like another band, or at least the college radio DJ&#8217;s thought so. I enjoyed our quick meet at PME last November and I&#8217;ve resubscribed to RRR. I love your choice in movies, but get a little edgy and trash something that is sacred once in a while. Thanks for writing Podcast Solutions, now can ya help a vlogger with that darn Wordpress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
