<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Experts Get The Basics Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/23/when-experts-get-the-basics-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/23/when-experts-get-the-basics-wrong/</link>
	<description>Michael W. Geoghegan's Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 01:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pete Prodoehl</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/23/when-experts-get-the-basics-wrong/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Prodoehl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/23/when-experts-get-the-basics-wrong/#comment-524</guid>
		<description>Just a note, nowadays about 99% of the podcasts I download make it to my portable device, and I'd guess that over 95% of my listening is done while away from a desktop computer...

Oh, I've also been downloading audio via RSS and putting it on a portable device for just over 2 years now. (My itconv.pl client has a date of Feb. 2004 on it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a note, nowadays about 99% of the podcasts I download make it to my portable device, and I&#8217;d guess that over 95% of my listening is done while away from a desktop computer&#8230;</p>
<p>Oh, I&#8217;ve also been downloading audio via RSS and putting it on a portable device for just over 2 years now. (My itconv.pl client has a date of Feb. 2004 on it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The importance of portability to podcasting? &#187; The Elusive Fish &#8212; Creative Services &#187; Article Archive</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/23/when-experts-get-the-basics-wrong/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>The importance of portability to podcasting? &#187; The Elusive Fish &#8212; Creative Services &#187; Article Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 15:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/23/when-experts-get-the-basics-wrong/#comment-269</guid>
		<description>[...] My own thought is that the defining aspect of a podcast seems to be the use of RSS to automatically deliver the files, and that opinion seems to be backed by the comments left for the study&#8217;s authors not to mention the wikipedia entry on podcasting. But what is driving the growth in podcasting is the underlying &#8216;my media - my way&#8217; philosophy. Listen when you want. Listen how you want. Whether that&#8217;s at 2 am in front of the desktop, 7am on a burned CD over the car stereo during the morning commute or 7pm at the gym with your MP3 player. It&#8217;s your choice. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My own thought is that the defining aspect of a podcast seems to be the use of RSS to automatically deliver the files, and that opinion seems to be backed by the comments left for the study&#8217;s authors not to mention the wikipedia entry on podcasting. But what is driving the growth in podcasting is the underlying &#8216;my media - my way&#8217; philosophy. Listen when you want. Listen how you want. Whether that&#8217;s at 2 am in front of the desktop, 7am on a burned CD over the car stereo during the morning commute or 7pm at the gym with your MP3 player. It&#8217;s your choice. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Wolf</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/23/when-experts-get-the-basics-wrong/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/23/when-experts-get-the-basics-wrong/#comment-268</guid>
		<description>Aside from the definition or whether or not a podcast makes it to a portable player vs. the computer: I see this more about content. There's a ton of utterly useless garbage out there I have to weed through to get to substantive content. So I download them (to my computer) to preview and then when I hear some bozo rambling about his neighbors (on a travel-tagged podcast) or ranting about their childhood (on a politics-tagged podcast) I dismiss it and move on. So no, it never made it to my portable device.

I don't expect the polish of a commercially-produced radio broadcast, but I expect some semblance of topicality.

Most people subscribe after listening/previewing on their computer first. Why waste the time or the device space?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside from the definition or whether or not a podcast makes it to a portable player vs. the computer: I see this more about content. There&#8217;s a ton of utterly useless garbage out there I have to weed through to get to substantive content. So I download them (to my computer) to preview and then when I hear some bozo rambling about his neighbors (on a travel-tagged podcast) or ranting about their childhood (on a politics-tagged podcast) I dismiss it and move on. So no, it never made it to my portable device.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t expect the polish of a commercially-produced radio broadcast, but I expect some semblance of topicality.</p>
<p>Most people subscribe after listening/previewing on their computer first. Why waste the time or the device space?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Safuto</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/23/when-experts-get-the-basics-wrong/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Safuto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/23/when-experts-get-the-basics-wrong/#comment-266</guid>
		<description>Good point Mike. What I've found is that the so called experts use the good names of their companies to anoint themselves as the leading information sources for new technology. Then they publish expensive white papers that include dubious information. These white papers are supposed to assist businesses with understanding the medium. Instead, they confuse people even more than they had been.

People who really know the medium need to speak up (as you are doing here) and disseminate the correct information. I've already begun efforts on a social media wiki that will allow the folks who know to post their knowledge on podcasting and other social media technologies. My hope is that the new (and true) experts will be seen as those who are actually using and applying the medium. As opposed to those who got their information from other expensive white papers and hearsay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Mike. What I&#8217;ve found is that the so called experts use the good names of their companies to anoint themselves as the leading information sources for new technology. Then they publish expensive white papers that include dubious information. These white papers are supposed to assist businesses with understanding the medium. Instead, they confuse people even more than they had been.</p>
<p>People who really know the medium need to speak up (as you are doing here) and disseminate the correct information. I&#8217;ve already begun efforts on a social media wiki that will allow the folks who know to post their knowledge on podcasting and other social media technologies. My hope is that the new (and true) experts will be seen as those who are actually using and applying the medium. As opposed to those who got their information from other expensive white papers and hearsay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karin Hoegh</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/23/when-experts-get-the-basics-wrong/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Karin Hoegh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/23/when-experts-get-the-basics-wrong/#comment-265</guid>
		<description>Oh dear! Your going up hill here, Michael :) (sorry my english)

We need exact definitions of podcast, podcasting and podcatching, and I must say, there are a few unexact ones around. 

New Oxford American Dictionary, which you refer to, got it wrong the first time, when they chose the word "podcast" as word of the Year 2005:
"a digital recording of a radio broadcast or similar
program, made available on the Internet for downloading to a personal audio
player,"

no RSS - just download? - maybe that was too complicated to grasp - better luck in 2006 :)

I have, for my (however danish) study, defined "podcast" as the medium - like newspaper, radio, newsletter, etc.

"Podcasting" is the production of the medium - like broadcasting and publishing. And - you are so right. A podcaster is - like a broadcaster - the one who publishes podcasts.

AND the listener, the subscriber - is not a podcaster. We could call it the "podcatcher" - but that is among podcasters the word for an aggregator, so the problem might be, that there is no good word for, what we define as the podcast-listener/downloader/user/subscriber....

We need that, I think - 

Therefore I have suggested to gather a konference panel at the EXPO in September, where the more theoretical matters, definitions, analysis of the medium, etc. can be discussed. A more academic, but authoritative,  approach which could maybe add to eliminate the CONfusion, which among others the DIFfusion Group is adding to. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear! Your going up hill here, Michael <img src='http://mwgblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> (sorry my english)</p>
<p>We need exact definitions of podcast, podcasting and podcatching, and I must say, there are a few unexact ones around. </p>
<p>New Oxford American Dictionary, which you refer to, got it wrong the first time, when they chose the word &#8220;podcast&#8221; as word of the Year 2005:<br />
&#8220;a digital recording of a radio broadcast or similar<br />
program, made available on the Internet for downloading to a personal audio<br />
player,&#8221;</p>
<p>no RSS - just download? - maybe that was too complicated to grasp - better luck in 2006 <img src='http://mwgblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I have, for my (however danish) study, defined &#8220;podcast&#8221; as the medium - like newspaper, radio, newsletter, etc.</p>
<p>&#8220;Podcasting&#8221; is the production of the medium - like broadcasting and publishing. And - you are so right. A podcaster is - like a broadcaster - the one who publishes podcasts.</p>
<p>AND the listener, the subscriber - is not a podcaster. We could call it the &#8220;podcatcher&#8221; - but that is among podcasters the word for an aggregator, so the problem might be, that there is no good word for, what we define as the podcast-listener/downloader/user/subscriber&#8230;.</p>
<p>We need that, I think - </p>
<p>Therefore I have suggested to gather a konference panel at the EXPO in September, where the more theoretical matters, definitions, analysis of the medium, etc. can be discussed. A more academic, but authoritative,  approach which could maybe add to eliminate the CONfusion, which among others the DIFfusion Group is adding to. <img src='http://mwgblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; 80% of Podcasts Never Make it to a Portable Player?</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/23/when-experts-get-the-basics-wrong/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; 80% of Podcasts Never Make it to a Portable Player?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 07:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/23/when-experts-get-the-basics-wrong/#comment-264</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Geoghagen and Paul Colligan also chime in on this subject. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Geoghagen and Paul Colligan also chime in on this subject. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Colligan&#8217;s Profitable Podcasting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Getting Honest About the Podcast Numbers</title>
		<link>http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/23/when-experts-get-the-basics-wrong/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Colligan&#8217;s Profitable Podcasting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Getting Honest About the Podcast Numbers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 05:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mwgblog.com/archives/2006/03/23/when-experts-get-the-basics-wrong/#comment-263</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: Michael Goeghegan makes some comments about the source material for the Design Technica piece. As always, he's right. I'm glad some of us understand the essentials. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: Michael Goeghegan makes some comments about the source material for the Design Technica piece. As always, he&#8217;s right. I&#8217;m glad some of us understand the essentials. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
